By Donald H. Smith, Ph.D. and Sam Anderson, Ph.D | Originally Published at Black Star News. June 18, 2013
Carter G. Woodson penned a timeless classic on mis-education [On Education]
Common Core State Standards created by the Council of State School Officers and the National Governors Association are inadequate for all American school children. Now adopted by 45 states, the District of Columbia and four territories, the Standards are demeaning and particularly unacceptable for students of African descent.
While there is presently considerable dissent among states, parents, educators and even students, with regard to the suitability of the standards for all students, those states which reverse their adoption of the Standards risk their eligibility for Race to the Top funds. Yet, in spite of pressure from the White House for national acceptance of the Standards, the State of New York Assembly and Senate, for example, have recently introduced a bill to “discontinue implementation of the Common Core State Standards”.
In the interest of students of color, it is important that Black and Latino legislators support the bill to end the government required Common Core State Standards in New York State.
Dr. Carter G. Woodson, Ph.D. Harvard, wrote in his classic book, The Mis-education of the Negro (1933), that education in America was intended purposefully to make people of African descent feel inferior and people of European descent appear superior. That white supremacist purpose was then and is now still manifested in teacher training, in curriculum, in instruction, in books, newspapers, broadcasting, films and, most importantly, in public discourse, philosophy and institutionalized in public policy.
Criticism of the Common Core State Standards
No other culture came to America in chains to be eradicated or suppressed and vilified by Americans of European descent who have historically and presently been accorded unearned special privileges because of their skin color and heritage (despite the class differences among them).
Claims of the new standards
The CCSS claim these are only recommendations, not required readings. Presumably states are free to choose their own readings. Then how can these readings be considered Common Core? The State of Texas, for example, has decided to remove such illustrious Americans as President Thomas Jefferson and Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall from its textbooks and curriculum.
Major Criticisms of CCSS
Such divestment is critical, not only for American born and educated students, but particularly for incoming immigrants who often bring with them their own biases and racial impressions of Americans of African descent.
In the areas of mathematics and science, a failed curriculum relies heavily on rote memorization for high stakes tests, rather than inquiry based learning of math, science and technology. This is coupled with inadequately educated mathematics and science teachers who have to rely on the textbook industry to tell them what and how to teach.
Moreover, continuing to omit the historical foundations of science as originating in Africa often results in Black students not seeing themselves as mathematicians or scientists.
The current “education” of African American students is an ongoing process of “Educational Genocide”, the deliberate dumbing down of a people while erasing or distorting their history to benefit other ethnic groups.
Without a truthful history of its founding, how it acquired enormous wealth and power on the backs of enslaved Africans, the United States will continue to remain a segmented nation, one which in several decades will find white Americans the new minority, but still in control of the nation’s major resources, primarily through the deliberate “Mis-education of the Negro”.
For our more detailed critique of the Common Core State Standards and our National Black Education Agenda recommendations, go to- www.blackeducationnow.org/id17.html
Email: Dohugh@aol.com
Sam Anderson, Ph.D: Retired Mathematics and Black History Professor. Founding Member of The National Black Education Agenda
Email: blackeducator@africamail.com
CCSS does NOT address social studies, so where is this coming from? Articles like this should directly cite the specific standards to support the claim, because when arguments like this are made, the battle against privatization and corporate profiteering is weakened. The battle against bias is weakened, as well… because the argument is based on a fallacy. The issue is with curriculum publishers who are creating biased curriculum and using the current “buzz label” as a panacea “you can’t review and challenge our content.” Getting rid of CCSS will NOT change this. Please challenge the real source of the problem … pre-packaged curriculum written with bias and marketed without honesty in what it really contains. Getting rid of CCSS won’t stop this from happening.